Airsoft Ohio Forums  
Old 09-15-2008, 01:07 AM
Rstienbarger Rstienbarger is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Richmond, IN
Posts: 37
Rstienbarger is a Private
iTrader: (0)
A&K M4 vs Echo 1 Stag

I have been looking to get yet another M4, I bought a JG rebrand called Lao Bing, and its really sucked, ****ty hop-up that I replaced along with a faulty battery and other feeding problems and whatnot, I've been thinking to sell it as a parts gun, for about 60, its full metal and everything.

But to my main point.
I am wondering about A&K being a decent brand, as well as wondering about the Echo 1 Stag-15 normal m4. I'll link them both and please respond with testimonials and whatnot, im really stuck on this decision.

Echo 1 Stag-15 (Full Metal Body???)

A&K M4

JG Steyr AUG- Guarder FTK, G&P Hopup
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 01:10 AM
Rstienbarger Rstienbarger is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Richmond, IN
Posts: 37
Rstienbarger is a Private
iTrader: (0)
I know such a quick re post but...

Also I want a full metal body, no snapping in half.
Unless people can tell me about amazing ABS products
JG Steyr AUG- Guarder FTK, G&P Hopup
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 09:15 AM
Zero's Avatar
Zero Zero is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: 614
Posts: 419
Blog Entries: 2
Zero is a Private
Send a message via AIM to Zero
iTrader: (4)
I'm pretty sure neither of these have metal bodies, just metal outer barrels and sights etc.

I'd get the Echo1. People love that gun, and Echo makes reliable guns for low prices.
Then outspake brave Horatius,
The captain of the gate:
"To every man upon this earth
Death cometh soon or late.
And how can man die better
Than facing fearful odds
For the ashes of his fathers
And the temples of his gods?"

Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 02:56 PM
nfafan nfafan is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 41
nfafan is a Recruit Private
iTrader: (0)
I Echo the Echo1 choice.

I have a JG M4A1 and an A&K M933 from their "M-Series"; I really like my JG but am considering buying an A&K M4A1 - because I like M4s and I especially like what A&K did with their M933 for the stupid low price-point I paid for it.

I've put just under 10K rounds thru these 2 guns and aside from battery-life issues, have had no problems. Both run like champs on new batteries.

Anyway, on to an example of an A&K gun vs. a JG (Echo1) gun…

Some differences between these two similar “Armalite” guns in my hands are:
(Note: My chrono is the “PMC” coke-can, and, I have not yet opened up the mech-box on either gun.)

Externally between the two;

The A&K has a uniform satin-black "commercial law enforcement" finish across all the external parts, unlike the two-tone Colt-graygreen and black seen on the JG. For some, the A&K may even look “too toy-like perfect”.

Nowhere on the A&K can you find any visible “Made in China” markings, the JG has it on the bottom plate of the pistol grip.

The A&K M933 I have has NO readily seen trademarks or logos of any kind – a real “CIA Black Ops" gun, whereas the JG has their “Commando” shield logo on the mag well.

Both have metal M16A2 “birdcage” flash-hiders - but with subtle differences in shape and spacing of the openings. Both are secured with recessed hex screws, but I haven’t removed either so I can’t say which direction barrels are threaded.

The front-sights of both are metal, and both have front-sight posts that are adjustable for elevation with the included tools - but the A&K does not have the little arrow and "UP" cast onto the surface of the front-sight assembly.

The JG has the tiniest snippet of a fake gas-tube sticking out from its upper receiver and entering the upper hand-guard - like my TM M4A1 does. This creates a realistic look in pics and from a foot away.
The A&K has no such illusion.

Further, the JG upper handguard has a molded-in gas-tube effect when glancing thru the top vent holes in the upper handguard. This can interfere with battery placement.
The A&K has no such illusion.

The JG lower handguard has four molded “ribs” inside to somewhat position the battery under the barrel. The A&K does not.

Both handguards have the external grip ridges, but the A&K has more of a texture to the plastic between the ridges.
The smooth JG handguard plastic almost sparkles if you look real close.

The JG handguards have more of an elongated, tapered “CAR-15” profile to them, while the A&K has more of the cylindrical M4 profile.

The handguards are not interchangeable between the two due to plastic thickness of the ends - and the fact that the A&K handguards are maybe a millimeter or so longer than the JGs. (The JGs handguards are identical to my TM M4.)

The “delta ring barrel end” of the A&K is quite realistic as opposed to the JG; with the A&K handguards completely removed, you can easily see the exacting real-steel look to the serrated-edged barrel nut and the weld spring behind the snap-ring Circ-clip of the delta ring. This realism is a polar opposite of the JG (or TM).

In your mind’s eye, the only thing missing from the real-steel look of the A&K is a stainless gas-tube under the upper handguard.

The entire surface of the thick A&K outer barrel is “finely turned”, as if done on a barrel lathe for a near-commercial quality firearm.
The JG has the same turnings – but much more pronounced and with a realistic “Mil-Spec” - lathe effect you can feel with your fingernail.
This is great as opposed to either gun having a simple smooth and painted metal tube for an outer barrel - like my TM M4A1 has.
On top of that; the A&K’s largely-hidden one-piece metal outer barrel has a real-steel ”heavy barrel” taper you see on the Star M4A1 for example.

The JG outer barrel is a lighter, thinner, steel tube under the handguards, like a TM M4.

Neither gun has the "Mil-spec" caliber and barrel twist marking on it as my TM M4A1 does.

Of the JG and A&K; the A&K’s biggest potential weakness is that there is just TOO MUCH METAL hung out in front of the plastic upper receiver:
Everything except the plastic hand-guards is metal, which looks great, but makes more sense on a metal gun – not this plastic one. Factor in the battery weight and it can get worse. I can see where front-end wobble can be an issue with a heavily handled A&K.

OTOH, the JG’s use of the (hidden) skinny metal outer-barrel reduces at least a little bit of strain on the plastic upper receiver simply because it IS lighter than the A&K outer barrel.
And (so far) the resulting lack of front-end wobble makes the JG feel more solid.

(Regardless of brand; do not use the front-sling point on plastic-bodied M4A1s if you want to keep front-end wobble to a minimum. Instead, get yourself a “single-point” sling attachment that attaches at the base of the stock tube. And when handling, stick to the carry handle or rear pistol grip.)

Of the LE-type tele-stocks; they are “exactly the same” - but different in that internal diameters are off a bit so they can not interchange between guns without either wobble or sticking. (Either that or the stock tube diameters are slightly different!)

The pistol-grip on the A&K is assembled with a much closer fit to the lower receiver than is the JGs.

The JG came with a greenish-gray steel 300rd wind-up high-cap magazine, while the A&K has a black steel 68rd mid-cap mag.

Moving inside the guns:

The 300mm A&K brass barrel has a nice “crown” on the muzzle while the JG’s 360mm M4 barrel is basically just a cut tube of brass.

OTOH, the JG has a brass “hop-up retention ring” that slides down over the barrel and jams up against the hop-up. The A&K does not have this.

The V2 mech-box of the JG has a TM-like wire-protection shield at the front to save the wires from potential pinch damage when you close the upper and lower receivers. The A&K does not have the wire shield.

I haven’t removed/opened either mech-box for shims and bushings yet, but I can at least tell you that the JG has a metal spring guide while the A&K has a white poly/nylon spring guide.

The JG has a black poly/nylon air nozzle while the A&K nozzle is in white poly/nylon.

The JG came with an 8.4V 1300mAh “Jinyin” battery and the A&K has an 8.4V 1000mAh “Hero” battery. When fully charged, either gun spits out the .20’s with an extreme sense of urgency.

The JG punctures a hole - but not fully penetrates - the center bottom of a Coke can; so the “PMC” guesstimate is of 340++ FPS - as it will easily thru/thru the sides of a Coke can.

The "PMC" has the A&K at only 290+ FPS as it only fully penetrates one side of a Coke can, just as my TM M4A1 does. I need to get a correct, ported cylinder installed… on both.

I do not have enough “range space” in my yard for accuracy comments on either.

Similarities between the A&K and JG/GB Armalites are:

Everything that wasn’t mentioned as a difference, plus;

Aside from the mentioned outer-barrel contours, both the A&K and the JG have equivalent metal bits and pieces - and heft - to make either one an attractive and substantial gun in anyone’s arsenal.

Either steel mag fits either gun and both work flawlessly - including the TM M4 mags.

Both have real-steel-like sight markings on their fully adjustable front/rear sights.

Both do the expected charging-handle-pops-open-dust-cover M4 trick, along with the non-functional spring-loaded forward assist plunger and useless, floppy, rattling bolt-release paddle.

Both use the typical M4-style 2-piece plastic hop-up assembly.

Both have white nylon/poly pistons and brass cylinders.
(Note that the JG uses a ported “Type 1” (??) cylinder while the A&K I have uses a non-ported “Type 0” cylinder - which is incorrect for the shorter M933 barrel. I’m sure this accounts for the reduced hitting power of the A&K gun - and the TM M4 as well for that matter.)

Both use 18AWG wire which feels like it has the super-flexible silicon insulation.

Anyway; hope this was of help to you or someone else out there on the A&K.

Last edited by nfafan; 09-15-2008 at 03:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 04:03 PM
Redwolfey's Avatar
Redwolfey Redwolfey is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Troy
Posts: 286
Redwolfey is a Private
iTrader: (10)
Wow, that was a bit of a read. =) A great compare & contrast though, nicely done. Anyway on topic I would have to say the Echo 1 is a great gun. I've owned one for 3 months now, no problems what so ever. Just take care of it and it will take care of you back.

"If you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat." ~Ronald Reagan

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22 AM.

Airsoft Guns, Tactical Gear, Military Gear, Ohio Airsoft Retailer

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2005 - 2009 Airsoft Ohio